Re: Fix slot's xmin advancement and subxact's lost snapshots in decoding.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix slot's xmin advancement and subxact's lost snapshots in decoding.
Date: 2018-06-18 18:04:19
Message-ID: 20180618180419.mysc6nxvntgvfgg2@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-Jun-11, Antonin Houska wrote:

> Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Please see detailed description of the issues, tests which reproduce
> > them and fixes in the attached patch.
>
> I've played with your tests and gdb for a while, both w/o and with your
> patch. I think I can understand both problems. I could not invent simpler way
> to fix them.
>
> One comment about the coding: since you introduce a new transaction list and
> it's sorted by LSN, I think you should make the function AssertTXNLsnOrder()
> more generic and use it to check the by_base_snapshot_lsn list too. For
> example call it after the list insertion and deletion in
> ReorderBufferPassBaseSnapshot().

I've been going over this patch also, and I've made a few minor edits of
the patch and the existing code as I come to understand what it's all
about.

> Also I think it makes no harm if you split the diff into two, although both
> fixes use the by_base_snapshot_lsn field.

Please don't.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2018-06-18 18:06:54 Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-06-18 17:43:57 Re: Removing "Included attributes in B-tree indexes" section from docs