Re: Removing "Included attributes in B-tree indexes" section from docs

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing "Included attributes in B-tree indexes" section from docs
Date: 2018-06-18 17:31:59
Message-ID: 20180618173159.qfywyrhtzrj3i6ae@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-06-18 13:21:43 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-17, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I don't necessarily object to the proposed change, but I think you
> > > should generally wait a bit longer for others to react.
> >
> > What wait period do you think is appropriate in this case?
>
> One which includes at least half a working day in a different timezone.
> You asked mid-afternoon on a Friday in a timezone pretty far west. I
> think you could find people in their offices in Easter Island, but not
> many more.

I think there's also a question of how much a patch is blocking you /
others. A shorter question period is more understandable if it's step
3/40, rather than 1/1...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2018-06-18 17:39:14 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-06-18 17:31:48 Re: Index Skip Scan