From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy Group (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 11 Major Features |
Date: | 2018-06-14 20:11:30 |
Message-ID: | 20180614201130.t5n57foyxvj2rqrn@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 2018-Jun-08, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/24/18 10:48, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> > PostgreSQL 11 Beta 1 went live today with a preliminary list of major
> > features:
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/static/release-11.html#id-1.11.6.5.3
>
> If we're going to link to this subsection publicly, we should probably
> give it an ID.
Why do we call it "Overview"? "Major Enhancements" seems a better
title. It's been called Overview in all previous releases but I don't
see why we need to keep it that way.
> > As with everything in the beta, this may not be the final list: we may
> > need to add / remove based on what we see in testing, what features
> > may have more of an impact on people’s usage of PostgreSQL than
> > we may have initially noticed, etc.
>
> I suggest replacing references to "SQL:2011 standard" with just "SQL
> standard". The feature in question was already present in SQL:2008, and
> SQ:2016 is the latest, so the reference to SQL:2011 is meaningless.
Right. (There's only one, which appears in two places.)
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-06-25 14:44:43 | Re: OSCON 2017 Booth application |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-06-08 16:39:18 | Re: PostgreSQL 11 Major Features |