Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jürgen Strobel <juergen+postgresql(at)strobel(dot)info>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
Date: 2018-06-14 01:57:53
Message-ID: 20180614015753.GD1597@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 03:39:04PM +0200, Jürgen Strobel wrote:
> I agree, and I imagine especially being able to use per-partition
> sequences would be a common use case. That was my motivation when I
> discovered it, and it was very counter intuitive to me.
>
> Thanks for the NULL violation patch btw.

Please note that I have added this thread to the Open item page, under
the older bug queue, and that a CF entry has been added so as we don't
lost track of it:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/18/1671/
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-06-14 02:07:58 Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
Previous Message 小威 2018-06-14 00:08:58 Re: BUG #15237: I got "ERROR: source for a multiple-column UPDATE item must be a sub-SELECT or ROW() expression"

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-06-14 02:07:58 Re: BUG #15212: Default values in partition tables don't work as expected and allow NOT NULL violation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-06-14 01:49:52 Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development