Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16] GSSAPI encryption support
Date: 2018-06-07 21:00:59
Message-ID: 20180607210058.GE24501@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:16:31PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> > Me and the bot are having an argument. This should green Linux but I
> > dunno about Windows.
> BTW if you're looking for a way to try stuff out on Windows exactly
> the way cfbot does it without posting a new patch to the mailing list,
> I put some instructions here:
> The .patch there could certainly be improved (ideally, I think, it'd
> run the whole build farm animal script) but it's a start.

Cool! Is there any reason that your patch for Travis and AppVeyor
integration is not just committed to master?

Is there a way to get my CF entry building in cfbot, or will it get
there when it gets there?

I know I can just apply your patch, push to my fork, and have Travis and
AppVeyor build it. And I just might, but cfbot is a neato service!


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-07 21:19:18 Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-06-07 20:57:36 Code of Conduct committee: call for volunteers