Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Date: 2018-05-28 20:23:14
Message-ID: 20180528202314.GB5291@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:16:08AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I would argue the exact opposite - mail is a lot more flexible than using
> github issues and that's one of the most important reasons I prefer it. 
>
> (and there are of course many ways to tag and categorize your email, many more
> so than with issues. Specifically bookmarks will of course depend on your mail
> program) 
>
> There are definitely advantages with issues for tracking, such as getting a
> more structured central repository of them (but that requires very strict rules
> for how to apply them and huge amounts of maintenance effort), but as a
> communications tool I'd say email is vastly superior, particularly thanks to
> the flexibility. 

It might be that occasional uses would find github easier, and more
invested users would find email easier.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-05-28 21:18:38 Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-05-28 19:57:32 Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid