Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems
Date: 2018-05-19 23:57:06
Message-ID: 20180519235706.GA1603@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 07:41:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm +1 for backpatching it. It may be operating as designed by PeterE
>> ten years ago, but it's not operating as designed by the SQL standard.
>
> By that argument, *anyplace* where we're missing a SQL-spec feature
> is a back-patchable bug. I don't buy it.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-05-20 00:05:22 Fix some error handling for read() and errno
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-05-19 23:41:10 Re: Fix for FETCH FIRST syntax problems