Re: PG 11 feature count

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 11 feature count
Date: 2018-05-18 15:33:43
Message-ID: 20180518153343.GH3088@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:49:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Just yesterday Andres was telling us that pg11 has so much new stuff,
> > when compared to 9.5 and 9.6, that seemed to have not as much shiny
> > things. I think it's all in the eye of the beholder; our releases are
> > large, and getting larger every year.
>
> Yeah. My feeling for the last year or two has been that so much
> development is happening that I can't keep track of it all.
>
> Much of it is in the direction of "better performance", and I think
> Bruce's opinion of what's a documentable feature is biased against
> including that type of change. So that might account for some of
> these numbers, too.

It probably is biased, but hopefully consistently so --- that would
explain the decline.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arthur Zakirov 2018-05-18 15:46:30 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-05-18 15:29:55 Re: master fails to build on Windows