From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: authentication methods sections |
Date: | 2018-05-09 04:58:37 |
Message-ID: | 20180509045837.GB11897@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:21:03AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/14/18 17:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> > <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > I find that the section authentication methods
> > <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/auth-methods.html
> > <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/auth-methods.html>> is
> > becoming harder to read and navigate, because we keep adding
> > authentication methods and more information about them, and it's all on
> > one HTML page. I propose to move those sections up one level in the
> > hierarchy so they end up on separate HTML pages.
> >
> >
> > +1, that definitely seems like a good idea.
>
> pushed
Sorry for coming late here, but the patch which has been committed,
56811e57, results in a section which is completely empty:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/auth-methods.html
And all the authentication methods get listed here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/client-authentication.html
So I find the result even more confusing than the original. Wouldn't it
be more simple to just remove "Authentication Methods" if the current
layer is kept?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-05-09 13:02:57 | RLS does not itself expand to views, unless you set a right owner - worth mentioning? |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-05-07 18:14:02 | json_to_record Example |