| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so? |
| Date: | 2018-04-27 00:19:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20180427001914.GB3419@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:16:09PM -0600, Jason Petersen wrote:
> So the tooling around people using it is there and it’s used by some
> very large and mature projects covering a variety of domains: I don’t
> know if it’s “poorly supported” (the documentation leaves something to
> be desired), but if CMake has trouble down the line a lot of very
> important projects will be in trouble. It seems like a pretty safe bet
> given the sheer inertia of the list above.
Yes, those would be arguments pushing in favor of cmake. Yuriy has
mentioned me a couple of times that when he worked on the cmake
integration on Windows he used heavily VS because that was quite
friendly on Windows and their was a good integration work.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-04-27 00:20:40 | Re: Toast issues with OldestXmin going backwards |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-04-27 00:13:22 | Re: Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48? |