On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:40:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On closer inspection, such a cross-check wouldn't have helped find this
> particular mistake, because it was in an error exit path that's likely
> never been exercised by anybody, and certainly isn't hit in the regression
> tests. Still, I think it'd be a good thing to add, and hence propose the
> attached patch. (I've verified that the warning doesn't fire in "make
> check-world".)
Good idea. +1 for your proposed patch.
--
Michael