Re: 2018-03 CF Cleanup

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2018-03 CF Cleanup
Date: 2018-04-10 15:24:26
Message-ID: 20180410152426.afy4pkfnm75pcjz7@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Steele wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> I have gone through all the remaining non-bug entries in CF 2018-03 and
> pushed them or closed them as appropriate. The majority of the patches
> were in Needs Review or Ready for Committer status and I did a brief
> review of each to be sure the state was reasonable.

Thanks!

> For the moment I have left all bugs in the 2018-03 CF. I can can add
> them to the "Older Bugs" section of the PG 11 Open Items but I'm not
> convinced that is the best way to track them. If they are added to
> "Older Bugs", does that mean they get closed? Or should we just add a
> link to the CF entry in "Older Bugs"?

OpenItem's "Older Bugs" section is generally a way to ignore items
forever (ie., they don't represent a true Open Item for this release.)
I think it's better to move these patches to the next commitfest
instead.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2018-04-10 15:26:19 Re: lazy detoasting
Previous Message David Steele 2018-04-10 15:17:59 2018-03 CF Cleanup