Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff
Date: 2018-04-08 01:30:05
Message-ID: 20180408013005.vsltx5szz7kvskei@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-04-07 14:23:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think I'd just drop those asserts altogether. The hardware is in charge
> of complaining about misaligned pointers.

I came around to that view. The problem with "natural" and atomic
alignment differing is only relevant for 64bit integers (4 byte natural,
8 byte atomic). Pushing that once the tests finish.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edmund Horner 2018-04-08 01:59:15 Re: PATCH: psql tab completion for SELECT
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-08 00:15:09 Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time