From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Date: | 2018-04-07 13:18:03 |
Message-ID: | 20180407131803.s2oahtjluonu6jpn@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley wrote:
> It's not exactly wrong but:
>
> + * are turned into a set of "pruning steps", which are then executed to
> + * produce a set of RTIs of partitions whose bounds satisfy the constraints in
> + * the step. Partitions not in the set are said to have been pruned.
>
> It's only prune_append_rel_partitions which is only used for the
> planner's pruning needs that converts the partition indexes to RTIs.
> Would it be better to mention that the output is partition indexes?
> Maybe:
>
> "which are then executed to produce a set of partition indexes whose
> bounds satisfy the constraints in the step. These partition indexes
> may then be translated into RTIs", or maybe even not mention the RTIs.
Amit had it as "indexes" also in his original. I wanted to avoid using
the "indexes" word alone, whose meaning is so overloaded. How about
this?
"... which are then executed to produce a set of partitions (as indexes
of resultRelInfo->part_rels array) that satisfy the constraints in the
step".
Maybe "the boundinfo array" instead of part_rels, which as I understand
also uses the same indexing as the other array, and partprune mostly
works based on boundinfo anyway?
Not mentioning RTIs seems fine.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-07 13:22:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-07 12:57:53 | Re: Bring atomic flag fallback up to snuff |