Re: Mop-up for the bootstrap data conversion patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Mop-up for the bootstrap data conversion patch
Date: 2018-04-07 12:25:44
Message-ID: 20180407122544.mpn66rtpn7m3p4yo@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> I've always felt that the pg_foo_fn.h business was a kluge, and would
> be happy to get rid of it. But one could also argue that it would be
> a good design, if we adopted it uniformly instead of haphazardly.
> But that'd require more code churn, and there's no longer a lot to be
> gained thereby.

I vote for removing pg_foo_fn.h.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2018-04-07 12:27:15 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (the good and the bad)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-07 12:23:49 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning