Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

On 2018-04-07 15:04:37 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On 7 April 2018 at 15:00, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > On 2018-04-07 14:42:53 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> >> On 7 April 2018 at 13:31, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > Maybe the best solution is to pull those tests out of
> >> > partition_prune.sql then create partition_prune_hash and just have an
> >> > alternative .out file with the partitions which match on bigendian
> >> > machines.
> >>
> >> Here's 1 of 2. I thought it was best to get the buildfarm green again
> >> as soon as possible.
> >
> > Do you have an estimate how long it'll take you to produce patch 2? It'd
> > be cool to get this covered again soon. If you don't have access to a
> > big endian machine, we can construct the output from the buildfarm... So
> > pulling the tests out would be the only "urgent" thing, I can go on from
> > there.
>
> Attached.
>
> I've not tested on a bigendian machine, but the diff -c between the
> two output files match the diff on the failing buildfarm members.

I've pushed the two patches (collapsed). Trying to get the BF green-ish
again...

- Andres