| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 21:19:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20180406211909.wy6ot5vuxuttkwpn@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-06 23:12:19 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Daniel is working on investigating the isolationtester thing. See a mail on
> one of the threads where initial indications were the "atomics with no real
> atomics" (or whatever you'd call it) were to blame. We could redo that
> thing without atomics to get rid of that (and possibly should), but it
> would be good to figure out if it's actually broken first, so that part can
> get fixed if it is.
Is that an explanation for
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=gharial&dt=2018-04-06%2019%3A18%3A11
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lousyjack&dt=2018-04-06%2016%3A03%3A01
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=sungazer&dt=2018-04-06%2015%3A46%3A16
? Those all don't seem fall under that? Having proper atomics?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-06 21:24:28 | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-04-06 21:18:48 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |