From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Date: | 2018-04-06 21:03:30 |
Message-ID: | 20180406210330.wmqw42wqgiicktli@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-06 17:28:00 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So I pushed this 25 minutes ago, and already there's a couple of
> buildfarm members complaining:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=quokka&dt=2018-04-06%2020%3A09%3A52
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=termite&dt=2018-04-06%2019%3A55%3A07
>
> Both show exactly the same diff in test partition_prune:
There's also
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rhinoceros&dt=2018-04-06%2020%3A45%3A01
*** /opt/src/pgsql-git/build-farm-root/HEAD/pgsql.build/contrib/sepgsql/expected/misc.out 2018-02-20 18:45:02.068665297 -0800
--- /opt/src/pgsql-git/build-farm-root/HEAD/pgsql.build/contrib/sepgsql/results/misc.out 2018-04-06 13:55:50.718253850 -0700
***************
*** 32,40 ****
(6 rows)
SELECT * FROM t1p WHERE o > 50 AND p like '%64%';
- LOG: SELinux: allowed { execute } scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tcontext=system_u:object_r:sepgsql_proc_exec_t:s0 tclass=db_procedure name="pg_catalog.int4le(integer,integer)"
- LOG: SELinux: allowed { execute } scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tcontext=system_u:object_r:sepgsql_proc_exec_t:s0 tclass=db_procedure name="pg_catalog.int4le(integer,integer)"
- LOG: SELinux: allowed { execute } scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tcontext=system_u:object_r:sepgsql_proc_exec_t:s0 tclass=db_procedure name="pg_catalog.int4le(integer,integer)"
LOG: SELinux: allowed { select } scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:sepgsql_table_t:s0 tclass=db_table name="public.t1p"
LOG: SELinux: allowed { select } scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:sepgsql_table_t:s0 tclass=db_column name="table t1p column o"
LOG: SELinux: allowed { select } scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:sepgsql_table_t:s0 tclass=db_column name="table t1p column p"
--- 32,37 ----
seems you just need to remove those rows from the expected file.
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-06 21:12:19 | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-06 21:02:34 | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |