| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mototaka Kanematsu <mototaka(dot)kanematsu(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Wiki editor request |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 00:54:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20180406005442.GJ29402@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 09:52:28AM +0900, Mototaka Kanematsu wrote:
> Bruce-san, Tom-san, thank you for your explanation.
> I understood how they avoided the situation.
>
> We have to except patent algorithm or code like other contributing companies in PostgreSQL community.
> Is that correct?
> If that's yes, we can keep PostgreSQL policy.
> If that's no, I might have misunderstanding, please let me know.
I think when you said "except", I think you meant "exclude", and that is
right, you have to "exclude" using any patented ideas with Postgres.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mototaka Kanematsu | 2018-04-06 01:31:29 | Re: Wiki editor request |
| Previous Message | Mototaka Kanematsu | 2018-04-06 00:52:28 | Re: Wiki editor request |