Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-04-05 20:12:08
Message-ID: 20180405201208.yvubrg4i34fzwzxl@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-04-05 22:06:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I have now pushed this latest version with some minor text adjustments and
> a catversion bump.
>
> Thanks for all the reviews!

I want to be on the record that I think merging a nontrival feature that
got submitted 2018-02-21, just before the start of the last last CF, is
an abuse of process, and not cool. We've other people working hard to
follow the process, and circumventing it like this just signals to
people trying to follow the rules that they're fools.

Merging ~2kloc patches like that is going to cause pain. And even if
not, it causes procedual damage.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-04-05 20:14:54 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-04-05 20:06:36 Re: Online enabling of checksums