From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Date: | 2018-04-03 14:37:36 |
Message-ID: | 20180403143736.z42lxviikrf4iyxc@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Yes, that is a good point actually - we need to test that replication
> between PG10 and PG11 works correctly, i.e. that the protocol version is
> correctly negotiated, and features are disabled/enabled accordingly etc.
Maybe it'd be good to have a buildfarm animal to specifically test for
that?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-03 14:38:55 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2018-04-03 14:37:30 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |