| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Date: | 2018-03-31 21:56:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20180331215606.f2rjezcnzo4fiwgn@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-03-31 11:27:14 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I'm just saying that there should be two functions here, rather than dropping the old definition, and creating s new one with a default argument.
>
> So you're asking for something like bt_index_check_heap() +
> bt_index_parent_check_heap()? Or, are you talking about function
> overloading?
The latter. That addresses my concerns about dropping the function and
causing issues due to dependencies.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-03-31 21:59:52 | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Previous Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2018-03-31 21:31:16 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |