Re: Remove PARTIAL_LINKING?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Subject: Re: Remove PARTIAL_LINKING?
Date: 2018-03-31 00:40:29
Message-ID: 20180331004029.3fpilez5qplvtdln@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-01-21 12:43:56 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> We've still some support for building the backend with PARTIAL_LINKING /
> SUBSYS.o instead of the current objfiles.txt approach.
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=9956ddc19164b02dc1925fb389a1af77472eba5e
>
> Any objections to removing that? Seems that's largely just removing a
> bit of logic from common.mk.
>
> Note I'm not talking about whatever that aix logic in src/backend is,
> that seems independent except for sharing the SUBSYS.o name.
>
>
> I just encountered this while polishing my JIT patch, which has
> *optional* support for building inlinable version of backend
> functions. It'd not be hard to make it work for PARTIAL_LINKING, but I
> kinda don't see the point 10 years later...

And removed. Note the SUBSYS.o reference from aix appears to be
independent...

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-03-31 01:11:50 Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2018-03-31 00:30:26 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views