Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Date: 2018-03-30 07:43:35
Message-ID: 20180330074335.GH1368@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:01:28PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If you have a clever idea how to make this work with as few atomic
> operations as the current patch uses while at the same time reducing
> the possibility of contention, I'm all ears. But I don't see how to
> do that.

This thread has no activity since the beginning of the commit fest, and
it seems that it would be hard to reach something committable for v11,
so I am marking it as returned with feedback.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-30 07:46:15 Re: faster testing with symlink installs
Previous Message Chris Travers 2018-03-30 07:38:44 Re: Feature Request - DDL deployment with logical replication