Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch?

From: Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch?
Date: 2018-03-27 02:22:22
Message-ID: 20180327022222.GB21230@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:09:37AM +1030, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >> I am in discussions with Mark, he's going to disable the animals from
> >> building 9.3. (by setting branches_to_build to 'HEAD_PLUS_LATEST4'
> >> instead of 'ALL').
> >
> > So once we desupport 9.3, they'll stop building 9.4? :-)
> >
>
>
> Then we'll set it back to ALL :-)

I'll put it on my calendar. :)

Regards,
Mark

--
Mark Wong http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-03-27 02:30:21 Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-27 02:07:21 Re: Using base backup exclusion filters to reduce data transferred with pg_rewind