| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code |
| Date: | 2018-03-21 14:20:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20180321142052.qu7kzekjdg2aqjro@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele wrote:
> > Sorry about the confusing comment. It could be sometime later half of
> > the next week.
>
> We are now three weeks into the CF with no new patch.
>
> Are you planning to update this patch? If not, I think it should be
> marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
> has been updated.
This is no new development, only code movement. I think it would be
worse to have three different branches of partitioning code, v10
"basic", v11 "powerful but not reorganized", v12 "reorganized". I'd
rather have only v10 "basic" and v11+ "powerful".
Let's keep this entry open till the last minute.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2018-03-21 14:23:58 | Re: pgbench - add \if support |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-03-21 14:16:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |