From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
Cc: | sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots |
Date: | 2018-03-19 08:09:48 |
Message-ID: | 20180319.170948.139803971.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:40:23 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20180129(dot)194023(dot)228030941(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> Hello,
>
> At Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:26:34 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20180129(dot)192634(dot)217484965(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> > While rechecking the patch, I fixed the message issued on losing
> > segments in 0001, revised the TAP test since I found that it was
> > unstable.
> >
> > The attached files are the correct version of the latest patch.
>
> The name of the new function GetMinKeepSegment seems giving wrong
> meaning. I renamed it to GetOlestKeepSegment.
I found that fd1a421fe6 and df411e7c66 hit this . Rebased to the
current HEAD.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Add-WAL-releaf-vent-for-replication-slots.patch | text/x-patch | 7.0 KB |
0002-Add-monitoring-aid-for-max_replication_slots.patch | text/x-patch | 9.4 KB |
0003-TAP-test-for-the-slot-limit-feature.patch | text/x-patch | 5.3 KB |
0004-Documentation-for-slot-limit-feature.patch | text/x-patch | 5.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2018-03-19 08:10:42 | Re: Google Summer of Code: Potential Applicant |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-03-19 07:45:11 | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables |