Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction
Date: 2018-03-13 18:27:22
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-03-13 15:18:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently been discussing with Robert how to abstract
> > TupleTableSlots in the light of upcoming developments around abstracting
> > storage away. Besides that aspect I think we also need to make them
> > more abstract to later deal with vectorized excution, but I'm more fuzzy
> > on the details there.

> Hi, is this patch proposed for pg11?

I wish, but I don't see it happening unless I get a time compression
device from somewhere :(


Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-13 18:30:56 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2018-03-13 18:26:41 Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask