From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction |
Date: | 2018-03-13 18:27:22 |
Message-ID: | 20180313182722.if62ewa7c6c267av@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-03-13 15:18:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently been discussing with Robert how to abstract
> > TupleTableSlots in the light of upcoming developments around abstracting
> > storage away. Besides that aspect I think we also need to make them
> > more abstract to later deal with vectorized excution, but I'm more fuzzy
> > on the details there.
> Hi, is this patch proposed for pg11?
I wish, but I don't see it happening unless I get a time compression
device from somewhere :(
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-13 18:30:56 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11 |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2018-03-13 18:26:41 | Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask |