Re: public schema default ACL

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: public schema default ACL
Date: 2018-03-09 07:14:59
Message-ID: 20180309071459.GC1955713@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:00:23PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I also wonder why we're all convinced that this urgently needs to be
> changed. I agree that the default configuration we ship is not the
> most secure configuration that we could ship. However, I think it's a
> big step from saying that the configuration is not as secure as it
> could be to saying that we absolutely must change it for v11.

Did someone say that? I, for one, wanted to change it but didn't intend to
present it as a "must change".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2018-03-09 07:40:40 Re: csv format for psql
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-09 07:11:50 Re: [bug fix] pg_rewind creates corrupt WAL files, and the standby cannot catch up the primary