Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Date: 2018-03-07 17:30:17
Message-ID: 20180307173017.6hdvs24wm3ckqnkj@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

I suggest to create a new function GinPredicateLockPage() that checks
whether fast update is enabled for the index. The current arrangement
looks too repetitive and it seems easy to make a mistake.

Stylistically, please keep #include lines ordered alphabetically, and
cut long lines to below 80 chars.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-07 17:34:44 Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-07 17:17:53 Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-07 17:34:44 Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-07 14:58:51 Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)