Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Date: 2018-03-07 12:58:48
Message-ID: 20180307125847.GA12617@zakirov.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:47:25PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Do you mean that a shared dictionary should be reloaded if its .affix
> > and .dict files was changed? IMHO we can store last modification
> > timestamp of them in a preprocessed file, and then we can rebuild the
> > dictionary if files was changed.
> >
>
> No, it is not necessary - just there should be commands (functions) for
> preload dictiory and unload dictionary.

Oh understood. Tomas suggested those commands too earlier. I'll
implement them. But I think it is better to track files modification time
too. Because now, without the patch, users don't have to call additional
commands to refresh their dictionaries, so without such tracking we'll
made dictionaries maintenance harder.

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-07 13:10:12 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-03-07 12:47:25 Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries