Re: [PROPOSAL] Nepali Snowball dictionary

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Nepali Snowball dictionary
Date: 2018-03-02 16:56:28
Message-ID: 20180302165627.GA17800@zakirov.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:23:11PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> What is that entry for, if I may ask? We need to wait for them to merge
> it, then sync the snowball code, including the nepali dictionary. This
> doesn't realistically seem doable for this commitfest. Therefore I think
> this should be marked as 'returned with feedback'.

I understand the point. I marked the patch as 'Returned with feedback'
by myself.

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-03-02 16:59:36 Re: Rewrite of pg_dump TAP tests
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-03-02 16:50:09 Re: Online enabling of checksums