Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date: 2018-03-02 04:34:35
Message-ID: 20180302043435.GE2259@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:28:54AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-02-01 09:04:57 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I've been testing this a bit further and during a test setup with 4-byte
>> bools I still got regression test failures related to GIN, so it doesn't
>> seem quite ready. I'll keep working on it.
>
> Are you planning to get this into v11? The CF entry
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/17/1444/
> lists this as "ready for committer" which doesn't seem to jive with the
> above description?

Indeed, this is wrong. Peter, why did you switch suddendly this patch
as ready for committer? The patch is waiting for your input as you
mentioned that the GIN portion of this patch series is not completely
baked yet. So I have switched the patch in this state.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-02 04:39:42 Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-02 04:34:11 Re: 2018-03 Commitfest Summary (Andres #3)