Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Date: 2018-03-02 00:50:20
Message-ID: 20180302005020.ppmybylrjl2rowxg@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-03-02 13:48:00 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 10:26, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > FWIW, I've heard numerous people yearn for json*agg
>
> I guess it'll need to be PG12 for now. I'd imagine string_agg and
> array_agg are more important ones to tick off for now, but I bet many
> people would disagree with that.

Oh, this was definitely not meant as an ask for something done together
with this submission.

Thanks for the quick update.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-02 00:51:54 Re: Documenting PROVE_TESTS in section of TAP tests
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-03-02 00:48:00 Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg