Re: [PATCH] GET DIAGNOSTICS FUNCTION_NAME

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GET DIAGNOSTICS FUNCTION_NAME
Date: 2018-03-01 22:29:58
Message-ID: 20180301222958.n5j6z4read6lf5ot@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-01-11 11:03:26 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> However, I don't inisist on this patch, so If anyone other don't need this
> feature, I'll withdraw this.

Given this is where the discussion dried up more than a month ago I'm
inclined to mark this as rejected unless somebody wants to argue
otherwise?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-03-01 22:37:52 Re: Optimize Arm64 crc32c implementation in Postgresql
Previous Message David Gould 2018-03-01 22:27:26 Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate.