Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null
Date: 2018-03-01 18:04:06
Message-ID: 20180301180406.amwvgmfqy7ithqgi@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-03-01 14:21:24 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2018, 01:28 -0800 schrieb Andres Freund:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2018-02-28 14:28:41 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > I have added this patch to the next commitfest:
> > >
> > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/17/1576/
> >
> > Given this is a new patch, submitted for the last commitfest, and not
> > completely trivial, I'd argue this is too late for v11.
>
> I was under the impression that rule was rather about complicated and
> invasive patches, not just any patch which isn't completely trivial.

I think you're right this patch is a bit boderline for that. But we have
~220 pending CF entries, and fairly limited review and commit
capacity. Something's gotta give. A lot of those are patches that have
been waiting to be committed for a while. So things added first to the
last CF the day before it starts are prime candidates.

You probably can increase your chances by herding a few patches towards
being committable.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Tilmes 2018-03-01 18:04:35 Re: [PATCH] Find additional connection service files in pg_service.conf.d directory
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-01 17:54:22 Re: change in behaviour for format_type() call