Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, nospam-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TAP test module - PostgresClient
Date: 2018-03-01 10:27:13
Message-ID: 20180301102713.cinqpvrlfeavfc6q@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-01-11 16:54:10 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Thank you for the discussion.

If I understand correctly there's been no progress on this since, and
there'd definitely need to be major work to get something we can agree
upon. Doesn't seem v11 material. I think we should mark this as returned
with feedback. Arguments against?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-01 10:28:54 Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2018-03-01 10:21:20 Re: pgbench - add \if support