On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 02:44:37PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote: >> So the docs look correct to me on this side. What I find weird is the >> phrasing to define oldserxid. Instead of that, the current description: >> Waiting to I/O on an oldserxid buffer. >> I would suggest "waiting *for* I/O" >> >> A small patch is attached. > > Agreed. Committed.