| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mat Arye <mat(at)timescale(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Minor version upgrades and extension packaging |
| Date: | 2018-02-12 04:14:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20180212041449.ptocww5tsktvqmgz@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-02-11 22:19:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure what to do about it at this point. We could move that field to
> the end for 10.3, leaving 10.2 as the only ABI-incompatible minor release,
> but I don't know that that really makes things any better than leaving it
> as-is. Somewhere around the dot-two minor release is where uptake of a
> new PG branch starts to become significant, IME, so preserving ABI
> compatibility going forward from 10.2 might be more useful than preserving
> it against 10.0/10.1.
Yea, I think the damage is done in this case, and we shouldn't make
things even more complicated.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-02-12 06:06:08 | Re: A space-efficient, user-friendly way to store categorical data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-02-12 03:41:00 | Re: Minor version upgrades and extension packaging |