Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wait event names mismatch: oldserxid
Date: 2018-02-10 00:43:43
Message-ID: 20180210004343.GA2848@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 07:33:57PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I didn't pay attention to the second one. Thanks for pointing that
> out. But then like me a user may first land on OldSerXidLock since
> that is first in the list and get confused. May be we should use names
> which are not prefix of others.

Yeah, I don't think that it would be good to have users abuse of things
like ~ 'oldserxid' to track different event types. This encourages such
filters on pg_stat_activity.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2018-02-10 01:28:20 Ok then, how *should* one get the value of an XML attribute?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-10 00:07:53 Re: Disabling src/test/[ssl|ldap] when not building with SSL/LDAP support