Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CALL stmt, ERROR: unrecognized node type: 113 bug
Date: 2018-02-09 06:56:50
Message-ID: 20180209065650.GA24787@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 04:07:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You need to read that as "only a SubPlan can be executed after a SubLink
> has been processed by the planner", so please replace the last "latter"
> by "planner".

(I forgot to add Peter and Andrew in CC: previously, so done now.)

e4128ee7 is making is clear that SubLink are authorized when
transforming it in transformSubLink(), however I cannot think about a
use case so should we just forbid them, and this is actually untested.
So the patch attached does so.

The second problem involves a cache lookup failure for a type when
trying to use pg_get_functiondef on a procedure. Luckily, it is
possible to make the difference between a procedure and a function by
checking if prorettype is InvalidOid or not. There is room for a new
patch which supports pg_get_proceduredef() to generate the definition of
a procedure, with perhaps a dedicated psql shortcut, but that could
always be done later on.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-minor-issues-with-procedure-calls.patch text/x-diff 4.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-02-09 07:11:10 Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-02-09 06:07:52 Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11