| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Date: | 2018-02-08 02:29:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20180208022934.54txqcn6p6slw2ju@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >> Waiting as you say would be akin to what the patch does by putting
> >> vacuum on its own parallel group.
> >
> > I don't think it's the same. We don't need to wait until all the
> > concurrent tests are done -- we only need to wait until the transactions
> > that were current when the delete finished are done, which is very
> > different since each test runs tons of small transactions rather than
> > one single big transaction.
>
> Um... maybe "lock pg_class" ?
I was thinking in first doing
SELECT array_agg(DISTINCT virtualtransaction) vxids
FROM pg_locks \gset
and then in a DO block loop until
SELECT DISTINCT virtualtransaction
FROM pg_locks
INTERSECT
SELECT (unnest(:'vxids'::text[]));
returns empty; something along those lines.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-02-08 02:55:20 | Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-02-08 01:56:50 | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |