On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think what I had meant to write was something like
>
> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66))
>
> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did.
If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the
formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that
ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics.
--
Michael