From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 |
Date: | 2018-02-02 10:08:40 |
Message-ID: | 20180202100840.qydanu553sfwtddc@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-02-02 18:22:34 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> The clang that was used for bitcode was the system /usr/bin/clang,
> version 4.0. Is it a problem that I used that for compiling the
> bitcode, but LLVM5 for JIT? I actually tried
> CLANG=/usr/local/llvm50/bin/clang but ran into weird failures I
> haven't got to the bottom of at ThinLink time so I couldn't get as far
> as a running system.
You're using thinlto to compile pg? Could you provide what you pass to
configure for that? IIRC I tried that a while ago and ran into some
issues with us creating archives (libpgport, libpgcommon).
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2018-02-02 10:25:41 | Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-02-02 10:03:21 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |