Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Cc: sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Date: 2018-01-29 10:26:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for kindly noticing me of that.

At Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:07:31 +1300, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote in <CAEepm=3nOUqNWyKQ83StGUeCB9LUsTw66w=Sy6H+xKfSbcRu3Q(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > [new patch set]
> FYI this is still broken:
> test ddl ... FAILED
> You could see that like this:
> cd contrib/test_decoding
> make check

I guess I might somehow have sent a working version of 0002.
While rechecking the patch, I fixed the message issued on losing
segments in 0001, revised the TAP test since I found that it was

The attached files are the correct version of the latest patch.


Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-WAL-releaf-vent-for-replication-slots.patch text/x-patch 6.9 KB
0002-Add-monitoring-aid-for-max_replication_slots.patch text/x-patch 9.3 KB
0003-TAP-test-for-the-slot-limit-feature.patch text/x-patch 5.3 KB
0004-Documentation-for-slot-limit-feature.patch text/x-patch 5.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-01-29 10:28:22 Re: PATCH: Exclude unlogged tables from base backups
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-01-29 10:23:48 Re: Logical Decoding and HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum assumptions