Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Date: 2018-01-16 06:21:41
Message-ID: 20180116062141.GA3540@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>
> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\" has now caught up with upstream
> server"?

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-16 06:35:46 Re: [HACKERS] generated columns
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-01-16 06:14:14 Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use