Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patch for hash index

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patch for hash index
Date: 2018-01-15 02:33:24
Message-ID: 20180115023324.GG2416@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greeting Shubham, all,

* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Shubham Barai
> <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I have attached the rebased version of patch here.
>
> The patch does not apply and there has been no reviews as well. In
> consequence, I am moving it to next CF with "waiting on author" as
> status. Please provide a rebased patch.

Shubham, would you mind providing an updated patch which applies
cleanly, so we can change this to Needs Review and hopefully get someone
looking at it? Also, it would be good to respond to Alexander's as to
if it would work or not (and perhaps updating the patch accordingly).
Otherwise, I'm afriad this patch may end up just getting bumped to the
next CF or ending up as 'returned with feedback'. Would be great to get
this up to a point where it could be committed.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-01-15 02:35:26 Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-01-15 02:28:18 Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable