From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
Date: | 2018-01-12 16:43:19 |
Message-ID: | 20180112164319.GT4132@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:38:54AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > Others: Now is the time to raise concerns related to the proposed
> > file formats and tooling, so please do have a look when you have a
> > moment. At this stage, the proposed data format seems a good
> > choice to me.
>
> It's not very clear to me what the proposed data format actually is,
> and I don't really want to read several hundred KB worth of patches
> in order to reverse-engineer that information. Nor do I see
> anything in the patch list that obviously looks like it updates
> doc/src/sgml/bki.sgml to explain things.
>
> So could we have an explanation of what it is we're agreeing to?
That would be awesome. A walk-through example or two would also help.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-01-12 16:51:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-12 16:38:54 | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |