Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2018-01-11 14:36:41
Message-ID: 20180111143641.GJ2416@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amul,

* amul sul (sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Agree, updated in the attached patch. Patch 0001 also includes your
> previous review comment[1] and typo correction suggested by Alvaro[2].

Looks like this needs to be rebased (though the failures aren't too bad,
from what I'm seeing), so going to mark this back to Waiting For Author.
Hopefully this also helps to wake this thread up a bit and get another
review of it.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2018-01-11 14:43:44 Re: [HACKERS] [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-01-11 14:02:46 Re: [HACKERS] Early locking option to parallel backup