| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY |
| Date: | 2018-01-11 12:27:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20180111122736.rd2tuzpozggxcyzw@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>
> > I think this is useful enough. The fact remains that we can't check
> > very well for functions; maybe suggest a LIKE clause to look for ~>
> > anywhere in function source code?
> Seems, it's overengineering. It could give a false positive results
> and doesn't cover all cases such as C-functions, library functions for
> perl/python/etc languages.
That's true, and I agree we don't necessarily have to find everything.
I still think we should print the pg_depend query in the relnotes,
because those would be the most common cases of objects that need to be
rebuilt.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= | 2018-01-11 12:39:47 | Re: numeric regression test passes, but why? |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2018-01-11 12:26:42 | Re: numeric regression test passes, but why? |